Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Ca., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, is surrounded by reporters following a committee hearing on Friday about the Benghazi attack.(Photo: Cliff Owen, AP)
WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers said Sunday they want to know who had a
hand in creating the Obama administration's now-discredited "talking
points" about the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi,
Libya, and why a final draft omitted the CIA's early conclusion that
terrorists were involved.
The answers could explain why President
Obama and top aides, including U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, described the
attack for days afterward as a protest against an anti-Islam video that
spontaneously turned violent and why they played down any potential
link to al-Qaeda, despite evidence to the contrary.
Administration
officials have defended the portrayal of the attack as relying on the
best information available at the time that didn't compromise classified
intelligence. Democrats say CIA and other intelligence officials signed
off on the final talking points.
Republicans have alleged a
Watergate-like cover up, accusing White House aides of hiding the
terrorism link in the run-up to the Nov. 6 presidential election so
voters wouldn't question Obama's claim that al-Qaeda's power had
diminished.
"I know the narrative was wrong and the intelligence
was right. ... We're going to get to the bottom of how that happened,"
said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence
Committee.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who heads the Senate
Intelligence Committee, said she too has lingering concerns about how
the talking points were created when it was clear early on that the
military-style assault wasn't a simple protest gone awry.
She said Congress has asked the administration to provide an explanation.
"We
gave the direction yesterday that this whole process is going to be
checked out," said Feinstein, D-Calif. "We're going to find out who made
changes in the original statement. Until, we do I really think it's
unwarranted to make accusations."
The inquiry comes on the heels
of closed testimony to the committees last week by former CIA director
David Petraeus. According to lawmakers who attended the meetings,
Petraeus said the reference to al-Qaeda was removed from the final
version of talking points, although he wasn't sure which federal agency
deleted it.
A senior U.S. official familiar with the document, who
spoke on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized
to discuss the process publicly, said the al-Qaeda reference was
deleted because the information came from classified sources and the
links were tenuous.
Lawmakers said Capitol Hill briefings last
week represented the FBI, State Department and CIA, but officials did
not address what role political appointees such as Rice might have
played in the generation of the talking points. Republicans said they
want Rice to testify about what she knew and when she knew it.
"What
I do know is that every member in the intelligence community says that
references to al-Qaeda were removed by somebody, they don't know who,"
said Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.,
chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Petraeus had
signed off on the final talking points and that going after Rice was a
useless witch hunt.
But Rep. Peter King said senior intelligence officials were strong-armed into doing so.
"Well,
they had no choice," said King, R-N.Y., chairman of the House Homeland
Security Committee. "They had no choice at that stage."
King did
not elaborate on how he would know whether Petraeus was compelled to
sign off on the talking points, and the lawmaker did not give any more
details to bolster his allegation.
Sen. Olympia Snowe, a member of
the Senate Intelligence Committee, said she expects the committee will
hold at least three more hearings on the matter and publish a report on
its findings.
"It took 17 days for the director of national
intelligence even to issue a statement to say that it was a deliberate
and organized terrorist attack," said Snowe, R-Maine. "That's
unacceptable in today's environment."
Feinstein and Rogers spoke on NBC's Meet the Press. Levin and King were on ABC's This Week. Chambliss appeared on Fox News Sunday and Snowe was on CBS's Face the Nation.
Associated Press